Should I play 1.e4 as white and 2.e5 as black?

@JushBJJ2 play what you like the most. However, 1...e5 is not aggressive - if both players know the theory it often (not always) leads to slow strategic games. Also remember what @tpr said - it's only the first move - you can play in whatever style you want after any opening.

I'm an advocate of developing a personal opening philosophy. I choose openings based around trying to reduce my opponent's attacking options as much as possible, hence 1.Nf3 for white and 1...e5 and the QGD for black is what I currently play. Others want as sharp play as possible, so the King's Gambit, Sicilian and Dutch is something to consider. Find what you are trying to achieve in the opening and play openings that reflect that - also consider ways others may thwart your plans (as I pointed out people who want to can get quiet play after 1.e4 e5, with either colour, which could be an issue if sharp attacks are what you want).

@JushBJJ2 It's playable. Don't limit yourself to one opening though. Mix it up, and try various things.

For move 1 these four are top tier moves for white.

1) e4
1) d4
1) c4
1) Nf3

There are some other moves that are also playable as well that can mix it up and these are moves that are good to throw someone out of book.

1) d3
1) e3
1) Nc3
1) b3
1) g3

You forgot about 1.f4

1. c3 can be good too!

Im sure I can survive without opening theory, yesterday when i was having a bad time, I was able to survive in the opening, just a ton of mistakes and blunders because i was raging and went out of control with my moves, but e4 got into my likes again.

Yeah, after a few games, e4 seems more active, and entertaining than d4 openings and I love the style and the intensity of e4 openings. My pieces are open and all over the board, tactics everywhere etc.

Kings Pawn, Queens Pawn, even Knight C3/F3 (white) or Knight C6/F6 (Black) are all valid openings, it's what you transpose from that initial move (as W or B) that can develop in to so many scenarios.
There are no wrong moves in Chess if your next move can reinforce your previous move, build an attack, ensure to mutiple defend pieces, it matters not what your opening move is in this scenario.
This is coming from a 1100 rated player :p

@tpr - I find move 17 is usually critical

@JushBJJ2

1.e4 can very often be very forcing or else can quickly lead to some very forcing lines. You need to memorize a whole lot of stuff here. Any tiny mistake can quickly be punished. If you are comfortable with committing stuff, then e4 is very OK.

1.d4 is far less committal. Lots of more subtle approaches possible, less chance of running into home preparation. Depends how you want to play Chess.

1.e4 kinda commits you to loads of pro-active memory-based stuff, other opening moves usually do not over-commit you. Maybe less chances of very fast wins, but also less chances of very fast losses too.