bfchessguy even Rusbridger has admitted that happened. do you know who he is? Viner (do you know who that is) gets much of the blame nowdays, but Rusbridger was running the show when the Guardian switched from Assange support to Assange scapegoating.
@pretzelattack1 said in #39:
> indeed Clousems why should you care if the US supports Nazis? after all, we have been doing it since World War 2, from importing scientists to using Nazi spy networks against the Russians, to knowingly allowing leaders with a Nazi past to assume leadership positions in Europe. and now we have the support for neonazis in Ukraine, something the US admitted and the US media wrote about prior to about 2018 or so, and the support for genocide in Israel. Why should you care Clousems? so much more entertaining to criticise Russians for not electing leaders the US likes.
I have many issues with the things you say, but I think we should all take a moment to recognize the fact that your logic just equated Nazis and cheating wives.
> indeed Clousems why should you care if the US supports Nazis? after all, we have been doing it since World War 2, from importing scientists to using Nazi spy networks against the Russians, to knowingly allowing leaders with a Nazi past to assume leadership positions in Europe. and now we have the support for neonazis in Ukraine, something the US admitted and the US media wrote about prior to about 2018 or so, and the support for genocide in Israel. Why should you care Clousems? so much more entertaining to criticise Russians for not electing leaders the US likes.
I have many issues with the things you say, but I think we should all take a moment to recognize the fact that your logic just equated Nazis and cheating wives.
Well when someone is attacking an opponent wife, mom or sisters I know what to do.
youtu.be/wqIiTI0ft5k?t=15
youtu.be/wqIiTI0ft5k?t=15
hey Clousems I never equated cheating wives with Nazis. I equated the nazi supporting Navalny's cheating wife to him in trying to grift that sweet US NATO support money like Navalny and Guaido and Chelabi. as far as i know, Guaido is not a neonazi, and Chelabi wasnt either, nor was Diem nor Karzai or Navalny's wife. but they did share a common characteristic of lying for US money.
Just like the US always touts "freedom" and "democracy" it always finances people to support the facade. The pattern of organizing regime changes or sustaining the results of outright invasions does not vary.
bfchessguy if she puts herself forward as the new neonazi candidate to replace Navalny, she is fair game. kinda like Hilary Clinton; if she had stayed out of politics she probably would have been treated with kid gloves like Laura Bush. But she did not.
the point bfchessguy, is she transitioned from being Navalny's wife to trying to be the new Navalny. and there is always money for somebody like that.
@Cassiodorus1 About your source The New Atlas propaganda from Bangkok ( funded by Moscow )
"It appears that the modus operandi of both New Atlas and ATNN is to cherry-pick or manipulate information in order to arrive at extremely dubious conclusions that are solely intended to traduce and undermine Western governments and agencies.
Neither the New Atlas nor ATNN provide any information regarding their own backers or funding, but ATNN’s homepage displays the logo of a media organisation called New Eastern Outlook, which is based in MOSCOW. Therein, perhaps, lies a clue."
from the nationthailand press
"It appears that the modus operandi of both New Atlas and ATNN is to cherry-pick or manipulate information in order to arrive at extremely dubious conclusions that are solely intended to traduce and undermine Western governments and agencies.
Neither the New Atlas nor ATNN provide any information regarding their own backers or funding, but ATNN’s homepage displays the logo of a media organisation called New Eastern Outlook, which is based in MOSCOW. Therein, perhaps, lies a clue."
from the nationthailand press
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.