Your comment #24 is abusive, it is not allowed to insult concrete people for no reason.
GM Kramnik's accusation of that player is very unconvincing, and I just point at that.
I am not defending cheaters, I send a lot of fair-play reports myself. (At least on chess.com with a very high precision rate also in this respect.) That said, I do not accuse people publicly, only sometimes share my concerns with good friends. I usually admit that am not sure and I am also ready to admit that was wrong. (For example when a player whom I suspected turns to be a great OTB blitz player as well.)
When a strong grandmaster (like GM Kramnik) accuses 10 people, there will inevitably be some cheaters and some honest players among them. The proportion might vary a lot, the most difficult thing is to decide on concrete players and bring convincing evidence. When GM Kramnik slaps honest players into face in his fight against cheating, it is very bad. It is even worse given that GM Kramnik violated the terms of use himself, playing from another player's account.
GM Kramnik's accusation of that player is very unconvincing, and I just point at that.
I am not defending cheaters, I send a lot of fair-play reports myself. (At least on chess.com with a very high precision rate also in this respect.) That said, I do not accuse people publicly, only sometimes share my concerns with good friends. I usually admit that am not sure and I am also ready to admit that was wrong. (For example when a player whom I suspected turns to be a great OTB blitz player as well.)
When a strong grandmaster (like GM Kramnik) accuses 10 people, there will inevitably be some cheaters and some honest players among them. The proportion might vary a lot, the most difficult thing is to decide on concrete players and bring convincing evidence. When GM Kramnik slaps honest players into face in his fight against cheating, it is very bad. It is even worse given that GM Kramnik violated the terms of use himself, playing from another player's account.