General Chess Discussion - Terminology on Lichess#11 @trakoz To accept a takeback is your choice, regardless of the situation. Except if the opponent claims an obvious misclick, then accepting seems(still your choice ,of course.) the right thing to do. | |
General Chess Discussion - Would it be a good idea to add Racing Rooks to lichess?#4 @wings3 You mean stockfish? | |
General Chess Discussion - Terminology on Lichess#8 @MajorBlunder But each takeback is for the previous move only. | |
General Chess Discussion - Terminology on Lichess#6 #4 #5 Mind thou language people. | |
Lichess Feedback - Contribute my piece design#13 @monster_with_no_name You can then just replace individual pieces with your own. And heres a forum for more: https://ru.lichess.org/team/user-styles-for-lichessorg | |
Lichess Feedback - Contribute my piece design#12 @monster_with_no_name You could check out seanyseans work so writing the CSS would be easier (he has already identified the classes): https://userstyles.org/styles/127392/neo-piece-set Click show CSS. | |
Game analysis - Why was this game not won for black?#3 That's what I would have thought if I played, but stockfish show a simpler ending. | |
Game analysis - Why was this game not won for black?#2 As far as I can see, as long as you manage to keep the black king away from c3, thus preventing your pawn from being taken, you two would be able to keep going on and on, and eventually drawing. | |
General Chess Discussion - Endgame Accomplice #5 #3 Thats a "congratulations" | |
General Chess Discussion - New gm on lichess#3 Might be this one http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=3207005 | |
Next |
---|